Nawaz Sharif criticism illogical

On May 25, People's Party government presented itsOn international level, there are different measuring
viewpoint about Swiss cases in the Supreme Court oftools for good governance and on the basis of this
Pakistan. It was a historical event in the history ofanalysis the donor agencies and banks issue funds.
Pakistan. The government ministers were standing likeThese organizations keep an eye on the accountability
accused in the court but this attitude of People's partyprocess, political stability, non-violence, writ of the
is appreciable. At least they did not attack the court asgovernment, powers of the government, rule of law,
Nawaz did in 90's. People's Party has set an examplecorruption, education, transport, taxation, people's trust
for Pakistani elites, how to behave in time of crisis.in the government, crime rate, availability of the
            But Nawaz, seeing People's partyresources, size of the bureaucracy, economic
a bit successful in this period of crisis, started criticizingprogress, research, and democracy.
the government policy and deriding the government forGood governance is the first step towards
its governance. To understand this illogical and untimelydevelopment. If two countries are having similar
criticism of Nawaz, it is necessary that the generalresources but stands at different levels of
masses should have clear understanding of gooddevelopment, it is because of the difference of
governance, especially in time of war.governance. The countries where there is corruption,
Governance means to minimize the political, social andreckless handling of funds, no accountability, violations
economical shortcomings of a state by the properof human rights and frequent martial laws will result in
utilization of government machinery, civil society, medialow growth rate. According to the World Bank report,
and market. If the mandatory objectives are achievedcountries having good governance can decrease
successfully, it is called good governance. But normallypoverty rate by one percent if they get funds
common people define good governance as excellentequivalent to one percent of their GDP. Good
performance of the administrative bodies of the state.governance results in getting higher of consciousness
Common people also think that these administrativein public. They will not psychologically tolerate lies and
bodies of the state are at the mercy of the politicaldishonesty and will express their concerns boldly.
government. They do not understand the complexitiesNow consider those countries where there is war. Is
of the system.this possible that government of such country can
Good governance is such an ideal that is not possibleabide by the rules of good governance? Because
to achieve but in search of this ideal the country startsthey are busy in war governance. Government tenure
moving ahead and the ultimate result is an increase incan be prolonged by false promises and
the collective and individual revenue. Common peopleannouncements but war cannot be won by hollow
judge the government is this way. However, toslogans. Good governance and war both needs
understand good governance there must be someresources. The problem is that if resources are
questions in our minds. What are the characteristicsconsumed by war so can we apply the same
and principles of good governance? How thesemeasuring tools to judge the governance, which were
principles are applied? Moreover, what are theused in peace. Before firing the first bullet the
parameters to judge good governance? Governanceexpenditure of the war is estimated. But if the war is
is a complicated process that consists of differentinherited from previous government or when there is
layers, customs, traditions, technology, history,no other way out so is this possible that war and good
government, private sector, civil society and mediagovernance can go together.
affect governance. Public participation is must for goodThe failure and success in war does not make any
governance. This participation can be direct or throughdifference in expenses. War needs soldiers, machinery
elected members. But it is not possible toand infrastructure which can not be prepared by the
accommodate the wishes of all in legislation. Publicshort notice of the army commanders. Besides this
participation means the freedom of expression and awar needs constant tactics, thinking and energy. A
share in development.government busy in war cannot satisfy all the needs
Impartial judiciary is the backbone for goodof the people. And the people should not expect good
governance. There must be rule of law in the country.governance in war. War affects education, health,
Decisions should be made according to ruleseconomy, rule of law and legislation. In war, neither
regulations and then implemented. The institutions mustgovernment can perform well nor can the people pay
be made binding to solve the public problems within thetaxes. Both sides will have to be ready for sacrifice.
promised timeframe. All the people of the society mustThe problems can be solved by resources provided
feel that they are respectable citizens of the state andthe country is in safe hands.
their opinions are valuable. The process of transparentIt is unfair to criticize People's party government for the
accountability is essentially required for maintaininglack of good governance at the time when
good governance. Accountability does not encompassgovernment is busy in war governance. People's party
only the government but all the institutions including civilcame to power when the country was reaping the
society are accountable.crops of 30 years Jihadi policies. The U-turn of
Along with peaceful transfer of government, differentPakistani government regarding Jihadi policy is a kind of
geographical and linguistic groups must haverepentance of the past. Now during these years of
representation in the legislature. Strong institutions,rolling back, it is very difficult to satisfy general masses
monitoring of administration, professional and honestand especially Jihadi media. The good policies of the
bureaucracy are necessary for good governance.government are too washed away in the uproar of
Besides this the tendency of making such policies thatJihadi media against People's party. However, Gilgit
can strengthen the economy, eradicate poverty,Bultistan elections show that people still like this party.
making people as pivot of investment and purposefulThe local body's elections will also help People's party
competition in private sector should prevail.to recover its lost image.