Making a New American Excellence

Mass Production's Good and Evilthe answer. The struggle now is to rescue American
If industrialization originated in England, the techniquesbusinesses from competition from low-cost countries,
for mass production were invented here at home inand quality seems to be the only solution.
America. Pioneered by Ford Motor Company in theUnderstanding Quality
beginning of the previous century, AmericanThe call for quality is not a new phenomenon.
corporations became the engine for prosperity byManufacturers have implemented sophisticated quality
focusing on standardization and low-cost production.management systems for more than half a century.
The application of assembly line and interchangeableTo feed the quality drive in the business sector, a wide
parts enabled American manufacturers to speed uparray of complex theoretical and statistical models
the production process and at the same time cuthave been developed over the years. The ISO9000,
down production cost. As a result, consumers indulgedTotal Quality Management, Advanced Product Quality
in easily accessible and low-priced goods, andPlanning, Lean Manufacturing, Quality Circle, Bench
American businesses saw their profits mushroom. ButMarking, and Six Sigma are some of the buzz words
there was a catch that many American firms had notin the world of quality management. But the underlying
foreseen. As the middle class Americans grewobjectives for most of these programs are product
wealthier, they increasingly demanded higher qualitystandardization and production process improvement.
products such as, BMW, Mercedes, and Toyota in theProduct standardization is about ensuring that all
car market, Sony and Philips in electronics market, andproducts within a given category are identical.
so on. On the other hand, the rising tide of globalizationStandardization efforts do not aim at improving the
opened up the US market to low-cost suppliers fromoverall quality of the products, but at making sure that
China, India, and other developing countries. With thoseall products are of the same quality. A customer who
Americans looking for quality turning to the Europeanwalks into a McDonald's restaurant has certain
or Japanese products and those demandingexpectations about the taste, flavor, volume, and
affordable products turning to the Chinese or Indians,design of a burger. McDonald's seeks to satisfy the
the customer base for many American firms dried up.customer's expectations by supplying identical burgers
In addition to sweeping economic impact for Americanevery time the customer visits the restaurant. For
businesses, this phenomenon had political, cultural, andMcDonald's, quality management is not about improving
environmental ramifications. America's political powerthe nutritional value or the design or the taste of the
rose in the last century as a result of impressiveburgers, but it is about ensuring that customers can
economic performance. The decline in the USenjoy identical burgers every time. Product
businesses led to erosion of America's politicalstandardization is an important measure to secure
leverage abroad. Many countries increasingly lookedcustomer loyalty, but not to raise the quality of the end
east for a new rising superpower.product.
A vast literature has been produced on the culturalProduction process improvement focuses on the
and social effects of mass production of low-pricedproduction process and operational efficiency. It aims
goods. This discussion is beyond the scope of thisat eliminating waste and inefficiency, but it does not
article, but it is worth mentioning that mass productionaddress the quality of the end product. Six Sigma is
flooded the market with cheap goods that wereone of the latest inventions in quality management. The
designed to last for a limited period of time. On ansystem was developed by Motorola in 1981, and has
individual level, easy access to cheap goods meantallegedly saved the company millions of dollars by
that American consumers developed a mundanedetecting and rectifying errors in production process.
materialistic relationship to household products: theyProcess improvement is an important cost-saving
would use them for a short time, become tired ofmeasure. By eliminating errors, manufacturers minimize
them soon, and replace them. On a national level,the possibility of customers returning defected
Americans celebrated their success in generatingproducts.
enormous wealth, but their sense of national prideAdvanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) was
dissociated from American products. While Germansinvented not long before Six Sigma and has been
pride themselves in their Mercedes, and the French inembraced by Ford, Chrysler, and General Motors. This
their fine wines and scrumptious Brie, Americans sawand many other quality management schemes rely on
no reason to link national pride to low-quality Ford orcustomer feedback in their quest for "quality". In theory,
fatty burgers.APQP was designed to satisfy customers' needs, but
The low-cost production comes with a high price forwhat was hidden behind that slogan was much of the
the environment. According to the United Statessame old programs for efficiency, standardization, and
Census Bureau, the average American generatesminimization of product returns. The application of
about 1679 pounds of trash per year. Less than acustomer feedback was certainly a step in the right
quarter of this is recycled. The rest is buried in landfillsdirection. But the fact that a low-cost manufacturer
or incinerated. The more cheap goods are consumedsuch as Ford employed the scheme clearly showed
and dumped in the nature, the more the environment isthat APQP was implemented in an environment where
harmed.quality was subordinate to cost. It is reasonable that
The low-cost production techniques that provedthe scheme was named Advanced Product Quality
indispensable for American progress and prosperity inPlanning, and not Advanced Product Quality
early twentieth century, turned out to be America'sImprovement Planning.
worst enemy in the long run.Although standardization and process improvement
America Must Put Quality atop Its Agendaplay significant roles in ensuring the overall quality, they
Faced with growing competition from other countries,are not primarily designed for raising the quality of the
a paradigm shift from cost saving to a focus on qualityend product. Standardization and process
is required for American businesses to stayimprovement are ingredients of the cost-driven
competitive at home and abroad. This requires aproduction strategy rather than quality-driven strategy.
commitment at every stratum of the society: not onlyAfter the top management of a company has made a
the business managers, but also the consumers anddecision about what level of quality the firm wants to
workers alike. Consumers must demand quality,achieve, these methods are implemented to reach the
business managers must put quality atop their agenda,set goal in the cheapest and fastest possible way.
and workers must produce quality.The message of this article is not standardization or
The strategy of low-cost versus high-quality productionprocess improvement, but the quality of the end
has guided businesses for centuries, though it wasproduct. This is not to say that standardization and
formalized in 1980s by Michael Porter, who claimedprocess improvement are not essential for a firm's
that competitive edge was achieved by either focusingsuccess. Any supplier has to design efficient
on cheap manufacturing or on quality products sold atoperations that eliminate waste and errors. But the
a premium price, but not both (Porter himself used thepoint of this article is about making a strategic choice
term differentiation instead of quality. The application ofto compete on quality rather than cost.
quality in this article is the author's simplification). TheThe Realization that the cost-driven strategy was not
key for Porter was to choose the strategy thata feasible option in the long-run led to the development
enabled a business to specialize in one marketof the concept of sustainable competitive advantage,
segment only, instead of trying to be everything forwhere the idea was to supply high-quality goods that
everybody at the same time. In other words, for awere cost-effective, but not necessarily the cheapest.
business to succeed, Porter argued, it needed toWith cost-effective goods it was meant products that,
specialize in supplying products that were eithergiven their relatively high quality, were the best value
qualitatively indifferent but were affordable forfor the money, though not the cheapest on the market.
low-budget consumers, or products that wereIn other words, the idea was about supplying products
qualitatively differentiated but targeted consumersof higher quality than the competition sold at prices
willing to pay premium prices for them (see discussionhigher than the competition but low considering the
on generic strategies in Competitive Strategy:quality. The concept incorporated two objectives:
Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors,relatively high quality and relatively low prices. But it left
The Free Press 1980).it an open-ended question as to which of these
With a rapidly growing population and little competitionobjectives must be the primary focus for suppliers. As
from abroad, the obvious strategic choice forit turned out in practice, many American businesses
American businesses in the beginning of the twentiethcontinued to focus more on pricing than on quality of
century was mass production of cheap goods. Manytheir products.
new-comers to America were poor and had fewThe priority in the US has been to search for
resources. Thomas C. Cochran noted that theinnovative technology that could help bring down cost
immigrants brought with them relatively little householdand keep prices low, instead of shifting over to
goods. They wanted new supplies fast and at lowproducts of higher quality sold at a premium. While it is
cost, and were not in the position to haggle aboutundeniably vital for American firms to invest in new
quality (see: Challenges to American Values, Oxfordtechnology, history has demonstrated that new
University Press 1985, page 7). American businessestechnology has been quickly adopted by foreign
strategically positioned themselves to cater thiscompetitors, whereas quality-driven businesses have
growing market by supplying large volumes ofbeen booming as long as rising national income in the
affordable goods.West has enabled consumers to pay increased prices
As America's demographics became more stable andfor high-quality products.
goods from the Third World saturated the US market,Germany provides an example of a quality-driven
it became apparent that the low-cost productioneconomy. After WWII, Germany began its economic
strategy was sustainable only in a static world, whererecovery program based on high-quality manufacturing.
there was no competition from outside and the marketAs the average income level rose in Western Europe,
factors remained unchanged, or in a world where indemand for German goods increased, proving that
order to meet changing market factors, companiesstriving for quality is the only long-term strategic choice
could switch their strategic focus forward and backfor businesses in soaring economies.
with no implications for their brand image. But the realAmerican businesses must seek quality more
world never works in this way. Market factors changeambitiously. It is no longer good enough for American
frequently in a dynamic world, whereas brand imagesfirms to supply standard products at low cost. In this
remain inflexible. When a company positions itself as aglobal market, American car manufacturing must build
low-cost provider, it builds its brand accordingly. Thethe American equivalent of Mercedes or better;
brand image makes it hard for the company, thoughAmerican vineyards must supply American equivalent
not impossible, to change its strategic focus from costof French wine or better, and so on.
to quality when market factors change. It would be asThe shift of focus from cost to quality does not only
hard for Ford to shift its brand image from one of aseem to offer a viable survival strategy for American
low-cost producer to a quality provider as it would bebusinesses in an increasingly global market, but it also
for McDonald's to switch over to French cuisine.seems to present a solution to the cultural, political, and
In an increasingly global market, the only viable optionenvironmental problems of this generation, as
for US businesses is to produce high-quality productsdiscussed above. High quality products last longer,
for the simple reason that the relatively high labor costwhich help reduce waste and protect the environment.
in the US will force American low-cost producers outHigh quality products will also help Americans regain
of business, when competing with foreign suppliers.their trust in American brands, and the world to once
The American challenge a hundred years ago was toagain acknowledge the new American excellence.
build the country rapidly, and low-cost production was